Skip to content

docs: added NumberOfGPUs and MemoryLimitMB to the configuration example#8519

Merged
aldbr merged 1 commit intoDIRACGrid:integrationfrom
fstagni:docs_config_example
Apr 20, 2026
Merged

docs: added NumberOfGPUs and MemoryLimitMB to the configuration example#8519
aldbr merged 1 commit intoDIRACGrid:integrationfrom
fstagni:docs_config_example

Conversation

@fstagni
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@fstagni fstagni commented Apr 17, 2026

closes #8513

BEGINRELEASENOTES

*Docs
FIX: added NumberOfGPUs and MemoryLimitMB to the configuration example

ENDRELEASENOTES

Comment thread dirac.cfg Outdated
Tag = GPU, 96RAM
Tag = GPU

# (Optional) available RAM on the node. This value counts for gGroup2 limit
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cgroupv2 no?

Suggested change
# (Optional) available RAM on the node. This value counts for gGroup2 limit
# (Optional) available RAM on the node. This value counts for cGroupv2 limit

@fstagni fstagni force-pushed the docs_config_example branch from 2afb6f1 to d90ca41 Compare April 20, 2026 08:36
@aldbr aldbr merged commit 6e00e38 into DIRACGrid:integration Apr 20, 2026
23 checks passed
@DIRACGridBot DIRACGridBot added the sweep:ignore Prevent sweeping from being ran for this PR label Apr 20, 2026
@marianne013
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sorry, I saw that too late: While it helps, the error message "Could not find AvailableRAM" still seems incorrect if the parameter is called something else.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

sweep:ignore Prevent sweeping from being ran for this PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: A default of 0 GPUs should be possible

4 participants