Skip to content

Document use of 'Draft' status when reviewing PRs#3918

Open
jsiirola wants to merge 10 commits intoPyomo:mainfrom
jsiirola:use-draft-prs
Open

Document use of 'Draft' status when reviewing PRs#3918
jsiirola wants to merge 10 commits intoPyomo:mainfrom
jsiirola:use-draft-prs

Conversation

@jsiirola
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes # .

Summary/Motivation:

As discussed in the Dev Call, this PR proposes that we use Draft status to indicate that a PR is waiting on an author to provide input (and not on the dev team to provide feedback).

Changes proposed in this PR:

  • Document use of "Draft" status to indicate "waiting on PR author"
  • Update install instructions to use pip and not setup.py
  • Update the layout / formatting of the contribution guide page
  • Cleans up trailing whitespace

Legal Acknowledgement

By contributing to this software project, I have read the contribution guide and agree to the following terms and conditions for my contribution:

  1. I agree my contributions are submitted under the BSD license.
  2. I represent I am authorized to make the contributions and grant the license. If my employer has rights to intellectual property that includes these contributions, I represent that I have received permission to make contributions and grant the required license on behalf of that employer.

Comment thread doc/OnlineDocs/contribution_guide.rst Outdated
Co-authored-by: Bethany Nicholson <blnicho@users.noreply.github.com>
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 22, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.93%. Comparing base (fcb8bdf) to head (30aef12).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3918   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.93%   89.93%           
=======================================
  Files         902      902           
  Lines      106457   106457           
=======================================
  Hits        95745    95745           
  Misses      10712    10712           
Flag Coverage Δ
builders 29.17% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
default 86.24% <ø> (?)
expensive 35.64% <ø> (?)
linux 87.39% <ø> (-2.04%) ⬇️
linux_other 87.39% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
oldsolvers 28.11% <ø> (ø)
osx 82.72% <ø> (ø)
win 85.81% <ø> (ø)
win_other 85.81% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants