Skip to content

Capture Solid-OIDC with Global Access Token#252

Open
uvdsl wants to merge 1 commit intosolid:mainfrom
uvdsl:snapshot-gat
Open

Capture Solid-OIDC with Global Access Token#252
uvdsl wants to merge 1 commit intosolid:mainfrom
uvdsl:snapshot-gat

Conversation

@uvdsl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@uvdsl uvdsl commented Apr 21, 2026

Addresses #250 and captures the authentication flow that all current server and client implementations support (as of 2026-04-21).

This specification version is a snapshot of Solid-OIDC, where a Client uses a global DPOP-bound access token issued by an OpenID Provider to authenticate at an Resource Server.

@uvdsl uvdsl linked an issue Apr 21, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
@elf-pavlik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@uvdsl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

uvdsl commented Apr 21, 2026

That does look a bit weird at times :) I'd recommend checking this branch out and building locally and simply compare manually. The Diff is surprisingly small.

@elf-pavlik elf-pavlik requested review from acoburn and jeswr April 21, 2026 12:55
@elf-pavlik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As I understand the main snapshot will go to https://github.com/solid/specification/
Maybe instead of having snapshot-gat directory we just keep the branch that modifies index.bs and sequence.mmd directly. Possibly also the primer at some point, we could add protection to that pranch as well and keep it in the repo after publication.

@uvdsl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

uvdsl commented Apr 21, 2026

I thought that this repo would be the best place, given that the issue was logged here and the trace of origin of this snapshot is here. 🤷 I just want this to be done, so I can go back to drafting the other documents I need to work on.

@elf-pavlik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Please just go ahead and do it the way you find the most convenient!

@elf-pavlik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@uvdsl this version is missing Client Credentials section, is it intentional or something still on TODO?

@uvdsl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

uvdsl commented Apr 21, 2026

That was indeed intentional, afaik, not all current implementations support that flow. I only know of CSS and ESS. Not sure about all the others...?

@acoburn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

acoburn commented Apr 21, 2026

I was under the impression that the Client Credential section was added specifically for Solid26.

@elf-pavlik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We will attempt to clarify it tomorrow during CG meeting @jeswr @langsamu

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

publish snapshot of pre 0.1 version (spec+primer)

3 participants